Loading...

WEEK 1 MHA5030 CURRENT ECONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE-- DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS

Open Posted By: surajrudrajnv33 Date: 13/01/2021 Graduate Case Study Writing

 

This week will take a brief look at utility and demand production costs and supply, which is microeconomics as it relates to healthcare. Let’s take a look at the economy as a whole, where you will discuss the market versus the government as a leader or regulator of healthcare. You will further discuss the assumptions underlying the competitive model and its implications for markets and the government. With this brief background into the economics of healthcare, the learner will be prepared to delve deeper into the economics of healthcare as it is in the twenty-first century.

Your Learning Objectives for the Week:

  • Assess the U.S. Health Care System in terms of the business enterprise, economic systems, and basic economic principles.
  • Evaluate economic issues relevant to the healthcare policy debate.
  • Interpret the factors that affect the supply and demand for and health services in order to predict responses price, quality, and other factors commonly influenced by health policies.
Category: Accounting & Finance Subjects: Behavioral Finance Deadline: 12 Hours Budget: $120 - $180 Pages: 2-3 Pages (Short Assignment)

Attachment 1

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363098&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=218315&… 1/3

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-10) 10 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (11-12) 12 points

Proficient (B Range) 13 points

Exemplary (A Range) (14-15) 15 points

Criterion Score

Researched the

changes needed to

the organization

structure i.e.

reporting

structures,

information and

communication

structures, HR

management

policies, locations

and facilities etc.

/ 15Student did not submit

assignment

Work minimally

meets

assignment

expectations. No

purpose

statement is

provided.

Assignment

meets some

expectations

with minimal

depth and

breath. Purpose

statement is

vague.

Assignment

meets most of

expectations

with all

components

being addressed

in good depth

and breadth.

Purpose

statement is

present and

appropriate for

the assignment.

Assignment

meets all

expectations

with exceptional

depth and

breath. A

comprehensive

purpose

statement

delineates all

requirements of

the assignment.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-10) 10 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (11-12) 12 points

Proficient (B Range) 13 points

Exemplary (A Range) (14-15) 15 points

Criterion Score

Integrates and

understands

assignments

concepts and

topics.

/ 15Student did not submit

assignment

Shows some

degree of

understanding of

assignment

concepts.

Demonstrates a

clear

understanding of

assignment

concepts.

Demonstrates the

ability to evaluate

and apply key

assignment

concepts.

Demonstrates the

ability to evaluate,

apply and integrate

key assignment

concepts.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D

Satisfactory (C Range) (11-12)

Proficient (B Range)

Exemplary (A Range) (14-15)

Criterion Score

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363098&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=218315&… 2/3

Total / 50

Range) (1-10) 10 points

12 points 13 points 15 points

Synthesizes,

analyses,

and

evaluates

resources

to apply

concepts in

the

assignment.

/ 15Student did not submit

assignment

Does not

interpret, apply,

and synthesize

concepts, and/or

strategies.

Summarizes

information

gleaned from

sources to support

major points, but

does not

synthesize.

Provides minimal

justification to

support major

topics. Uses 1

credible resource

in the assignment.

Synthesizes and

justifies (defends,

explains, validates,

confirms)

information

gleaned from

sources to support

major points

presented. Uses a

minimum of 2

credible resources

in the assignment.

Synthesizes and

justifies (defends,

explains, validates,

confirms) information

gleaned from sources

to support major

points presented.

Uses 3 credible

resources for the

assignment, including

at least 1 scholarly

peer-reviewed

resource.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-2) 2 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 3 points

Proficient (B Range) 4 points

Exemplary (A Range) 5 points

Criterion Score

Uses correct

spelling, grammar,

and professional

vocabulary.

Provides credible

resources using

correct APA

format.

/ 5Student did not submit

assignment

Contains many (≥

5) grammar,

spelling,

punctuation and

APA errors that

interfere with the

reader’s

understanding.

Contains a few

(3–4) grammar,

spelling,

punctuation and

APA errors.

Uses correct

grammar,

spelling, and

punctuation with

no errors.

Contains a few

(1–2) APA

format errors.

Uses correct

grammar,

spelling, and

punctuation with

no errors. Uses

correct APA

format with no

errors.

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363098&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=218315&… 3/3

Overall Score

Close

No Submission 0 points

minimum

Emerging (F through D

Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C

Range) 35 points minimum

Proficient (B

Range) 40 points minimum

Exemplary (A

Range) 45 points minimum

Attachment 2

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359327&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 1/3

Criteria Unacceptable 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) 27 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 31 points

Above Average (B Range) 35 points

Exemplary (A Range) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality

of

Initial

Posting

/ 40No initial posting to evaluate

The information

provided is

inaccurate, not

focused on the

assignment’s topic,

and/or does not

answer the

question(s) fully.

Response

demonstrates

incomplete

understanding of the

topic and/or

inadequate

preparation.

The information provided is

accurate, giving a basic

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A basic

understanding is when you

are able to describe the

terms and concepts

covered. Despite this basic

understanding, initial

posting may not include

complete development of

all aspects of the

assignment.

The information provided is

accurate, displaying a good

understanding of the topic(s)

covered. A good

understanding is when you

are able to explain the terms

and topics covered. Initial

posting demonstrates sincere

reflection and addresses

most aspects of the

assignment, although all

concepts may not be fully

developed.

The information

provided is accurate,

providing an in-depth,

well thought-out

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. An in-

depth understanding

provides an analysis of

the information,

synthesizing what is

learned from the

course/assigned

readings.

Criteria Unacceptable 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) 13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 15 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 17 points

Exemplary (A Range) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation

in

Discussion

/ 20No responses to other classmates in

this discussion forum

May include one or

more of the

following:

*Comments to only

one other student's

post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts but only on one

day of the week.

Comments are

substantive, meaning

they reflect and expand

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts on more than one

day. Comments are

substantive, meaning

they reflect and expand

on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts and to the

instructor's comment (if

applicable) on two or

more days. Responses

demonstrate an analysis

of peers’ comments,

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359327&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 2/3

Total / 80

Overall Score

Writing

Mechanics

(Spelling,

Grammar,

APA) and

Information

Literacy

/ 20

just one line or

saying, “Good job” or

“I agree.

*Comments are off

topic.

on what the other

student wrote.

building on previous

posts. Comments extend

and deepen meaningful

conversation and may

include a follow-up

question.

No postings for

which to evaluate

language and

grammar

Numerous issues in

any of the following:

grammar, mechanics,

spelling, use of slang,

and incomplete or

missing APA

citations and

references. If

required for the

assignment, did not

use course, text,

and/or outside

readings (where

relevant) to support

work.

Some spelling,

grammatical, and/or

structural errors. Some

errors in APA

formatting (citations

and references). If

required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support

work for initial post but

not comments to other

students. Sources

include course/text

readings but outside

sources (when relevant)

include non-

academic/authoritative,

such as Wikis and .com

resources.

Minor errors in grammar,

mechanics, or spelling in

the initial posting. Minor

errors in APA formatting

(citations and references).

If required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support work

for both the initial post

and some of the

comments to other

students. Sources include

course and text readings

as well as outside sources

(when relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative (e.g., journal

articles, other text books,

.gov web sites,

professional organization

web sites).

Minor to no errors in

grammar, mechanics, or

spelling in both the initial

post and comments to

others. APA formatting is

correct. If required for

the assignment, utilizes

sources to support work

for both the initial post

and the comments to

other students. Sources

include course and text

readings as well as

outside sources (when

relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles, other

text books, .gov web

sites, professional

organization web sites).

1/12/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359327&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 3/3

Close

Unacceptable 0 points

minimum

Emerging (F through D

Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C

Range) 54 points minimum

Above Average (B

Range) 62 points minimum

Exemplary (A

Range) 70 points minimum