Loading...

NURS 6051 - Discussion Week 9 - Replies

Open Posted By: ahmad8858 Date: 29/04/2021 Graduate Rewriting & Paraphrasing

 INSTRUCTIONS: 

Respond to your colleague, by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues.

**At least 2 references per reply, and they need to support information in the reply** 

Category: Business & Management Subjects: Auditing Deadline: 12 Hours Budget: $120 - $180 Pages: 2-3 Pages (Short Assignment)

Attachment 1

4/26/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16813466_1&rubric_id=_2258821_1 1/5

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Name: NURS_5051_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

4/26/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16813466_1&rubric_id=_2258821_1 2/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Main Posting 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re�ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.   Supported by at least three current, credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) - 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.   Supported by at least three credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).   One or two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed.   Is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Post is cited with two credible sources.   Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) - 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.   Lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria.   Lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Contains only one or no credible sources.   Not written clearly or concisely.   Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness

10 (10%) - 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.

4/26/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16813466_1&rubric_id=_2258821_1 3/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

First Response

17 (17%) - 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is e�ectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) - 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is e�ectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) - 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.

4/26/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16813466_1&rubric_id=_2258821_1 4/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Second Response

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is e�ectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is e�ectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.

4/26/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16813466_1&rubric_id=_2258821_1 5/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Participation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di�erent days.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di�erent days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_5051_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT