Loading...

Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Open Posted By: surajrudrajnv33 Date: 24/02/2021 Graduate Research Paper Writing

 

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 250-300 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Category: Business & Management Subjects: Business Communication Deadline: 12 Hours Budget: $120 - $180 Pages: 2-3 Pages (Short Assignment)

Attachment 1

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-493 NRS-493-OL191 Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal 200.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (89.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 80.0%
Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor 5.0% Revision is omitted. Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear. Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies. The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project. All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.
Background 5.0% Background of clinical problem omitted. Background of clinical problem is incomplete. Background of clinical problem are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Background of clinical problem are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Background of clinical problem are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Clinical Problem Statement 5.0% Clinical problem statement omitted. Clinical problem statement is incomplete. Clinical problem statement is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Clinical problem statement is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Clinical problem statement is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Purpose of Change Proposal 5.0% Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is omitted. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is incomplete. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
PICOT Question 5.0% PICOT questions is omitted. Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Literature Search 5.0% Literature search strategy employed omitted. Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Evaluation of Literature 5.0% Evaluation of literature omitted. Evaluation of literature is incomplete. Evaluation of literature is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Evaluation of literature is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Evaluation of literature is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Change or Nursing Theory 5.0% Change or nursing theory omitted. Change or nursing theory is incomplete. Change or nursing theory is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Change or nursing theory is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Change or nursing theory is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures 10.0% Implementation plan and outcome measures are omitted. Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented is incomplete. Implementation plan and outcome measures are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Implementation plan and outcome measures are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan 10.0% Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan omitted. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is incomplete. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention 10.0% Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention omitted. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is incomplete. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers 10.0% Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are omitted. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are incomplete. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%