Another advantage of using inductive reasoning is the low cost required to conduct the research, as the results are based on a quick build for the hypothesis, which is based on the observation without the need for sophisticated research methods such as interviews or focus groups. In terms of the time, applying this method allows collecting and building understanding about the user without a method primary research from scratch.

What are the drawbacks of strong deductive reasoning without sufficient evidence

One of the advantages of using inductive reasoning is that it can be applied based on incomplete information, as it is based on observation. This is one of the most important research methods in the user experience research. More understanding of user behavior can be acquired from observing how users interact with the product or application. Inductive reasoning can be used to turn these observations into hypotheses that can be used in the next steps of the design process in an early sage of the research process, based on secondary research methods such as local publications or observation as the primary research method.

How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning takes specific observations and makes general conclusions out of them

Another advantage of inductive reasoning tests from the employer's perspective is convenience. Inductive reasoning tests and other psychometric tests can be completed online with little required input from the employing organisation. This makes inductive reasoning tests a useful pre-employment screening tool to select top performers for later recruitment stages. Similarly, under supervised conditions, inductive reasoning tests make the ideal later stage assessment, and are often a major component of assessment centres.